Re: svn commit: r34914 - branches/http-protocol-v2/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:22:59 -0800

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 13:36, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>...
> No implementation of an RA API should be allowed to use a stale value for
> HEAD. Subversion != svn, and GUI clients that keep the libraries loaded

Eh? Where is that guarantee in the API documentation? I don't recall
us ever saying that would be the case.

Cheers,
-g
Received on 2009-01-14 00:23:14 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David Glasser: "Re: somebody please write the INSTALL section for SQLite"
Previous message: Greg Stein: "Re: RFC: Change minimum Python requirement to 2.?"
In reply to: C. Michael Pilato: "Re: svn commit: r34914 - branches/http-protocol-v2/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf"
Next in thread: Eric Gillespie: "Re: svn commit: r34914 - branches/http-protocol-v2/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf"
Reply: Eric Gillespie: "Re: svn commit: r34914 - branches/http-protocol-v2/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]