RE: Re: Trouble with attachments - better?

From: Chris Foote <cafoote_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:15:39 -0800 (PST)

With Attachment...

Chris Foote Wrote:
> Jack Repenning Wrote:
>
> > Is that what y'all are seeing? I'm very interested in all confirming,
> > and even more so contradicting, reports.
> >
> Not sure if this is related to the recent upgrade, but some messages in
> digest
> mode are completely missing a body, which makes them totally useless. I've
> attached an example of a digest for you to look at.
>
> In disgest mode I expect to receive the exact same emails as I would have
> in
> non-digest mode but as attachments in a single email.
>
> Regards,
> Chris

attached mail follows:

message/rfc822 attachment: Discussion_message_digest.eml

Received on 2009-01-13 03:16:11 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: John Gardiner Myers: "Re: [PATCH] Pass the name of the conflicted file to the merge tool"
Previous message: Chris Foote: "Re: Trouble with attachments - better?"
In reply to: Chris Foote: "Re: Trouble with attachments - better?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]