[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.6 blocker? copy operation during update fails

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:22:28 +0100

On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:12:35AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> You probably missed this discussion?
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2008-11/0957.shtml
> I think the result of that discussion was that we agreed that for
> items which ended up unversioned in 1.5 behaviour, "A+ C" is a
> better state than "D C" in 1.6 behaviour.

Minor correction: Looks like "M C" was the proposed state at the time.

Received on 2009-01-10 11:22:48 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.