Re: Question for status on accumulation of warning on svn:external instead of immediate abort
Achim Spangler wrote:
> I registered the issue #3148 which got a reference from #3246.
> When I started to dig into the problem some month ago, I detected the same
> that Karl Fogel wrote in his statement at:
> "The reason I didn't commit my patch was that there was no way to
> accumulate the errors and then display them as non-fatal warnings at the
> end -- and I didn't have time to add the infrastructure to do that. If
> we are going to alert the user, it should really be a warning, not an
> error, IMHO."
> And as I'm no svn internal expert, I see no near solution of this problem by
> Is there any plan of real svn expert developers to provide infrastructure for
> collection of svn:external warnings?
> - is this by any chance planned for 1.6.0?
> Could an intermediate solution help, which - maybe controlled by command line
> option - triggers simple ignoring of svn:external problems, and only prints
> at the end "there were some ignored svn:external problem"?
> --> maybe just skipping non-working entries is much easier than complete
> solution with detailed reporting
I'd like to spent a little while today starting a solution to this. Stay tuned.
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2009-01-09 16:16:02 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev