[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Status of TODO-1.6

From: Kouhei Sutou <kou_at_cozmixng.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:15:17 +0900 (JST)


In <495271AD.8020401_at_mail.utexas.edu>
  "Status of TODO-1.6" on Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:30:21 -0600,
  "Hyrum K. Wright" <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:

> * Test failures in Ruby bindings.
> These just look like they are the result of wrong expectations due to tree
> conflicts, but my understanding of ruby and the swig-rb bindings is so
> rudimentary as to remove all confidence in my ability to track it down. Kou,
> Joe, any suggestions?

The current test suits were all passed when they were
created. It means the current Subversion behavior is changed
since the time.

I don't know about tree conflicts. If the current actual
values are expected result, we should change the current
expected values. But I can't decide it...


Received on 2008-12-26 11:15:41 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.