-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Erik,
Thanks I have reverted it in r34917.
neon-0.25 had this function and dropped in neon-0.28.
Will work on the better fix common across neon versions.
With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Kamesh Jayachandran <kamesh_at_collab.net> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi Erik,
>>
>>
>> Erik Huelsmann wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Kamesh Jayachandran <kamesh_at_collab.net> wrote:
>>>> Author: kameshj
>>>> Date: Wed Dec 24 03:57:28 2008
>>>> New Revision: 34915
>>>>
>>>> Log:
>>>> Support commit of a new file of size(post-compression) >2G.
>>>>
>>>> Neon has a support of large file requests for quite sometime, Subversion should
>>>> make use of this support if available.
>>>>
>>>> * subversion/libsvn_ra_neon/util.c
>>>> (svn_ra_neon__set_neon_body_provider): Make use of
>>>> 'ne_set_request_body_provider64' if LFS support is available.
>>> Kamesh, this commit seems to break my buildbot. However, since you say
>>> "for quite some time", maybe I built Neon the wrong way?
>>>
>>> What do you want me to do?
>> Is it breaking your windows build?
>>
>> My neon is 0.25 which I believe is 2 years old atleast, I tested it in
>> RHEL-4.
>>
>> Can you post the details?
>
> It's breaking the build on Debian with a custom compiled Neon. I
> believe it's recent, something like 0.28. You can see the details on
> the failed build (build output) at
> http://mobsol.be/buildbot/i686-debian-sarge1%20shared%20gcc-3.3.5/builds/1873/step-Build/0
> .
>
> Hope that helps. If you need more info, I'll gladly supply it (tonight - CET).
>
> Bye,
>
> Erik.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJUjPC3WHvyO0YTCwRApnJAJ9Tzm9zWnzT8dIp0rNf1tdt51Zr8ACglI4F
Z1uDE2hanuuMpy7AmH8RZiE=
=W5U5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=991548
Received on 2008-12-24 14:05:17 CET