On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 14:03 -0500, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
> <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> > Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> >> This mail was going to be about a new branch date for 1.6.x, but I noticed that
> >> there are still a few items labeled "Blocker" in TODO-1.6. They are reproduced
> >> below:
> > ...
> > It looks like we're making good progress on the items in TODO-1.6, with all the
> > items either completed or claimed. They currently are:
> > * Actually document how to build with SQLite (ie, make the part in
> > INSTALL not blank, explain how to build against a newer version
> > of SQLite than what may be installed in your system, figure out
> > if the text in sqlite.m4 about being able to use a sqlite/
> > subdirectory is in any way true, etc etc)
> > * Tree conflicts - essential issues:
> > - #3334: "Merry-go-round" about update updating the base.
> > * Switch to skel for TC information, rather than using another
> > serialization format.
> > I think Greg has the first and third items, and Julian the second. Do we have
> > an ETA for completion of this items? Do we think that a Friday branch is still
> > workable?
I can probably get #3334 working to some useful extent by Friday. I'll
> > Thanks,
> > -Hyrum
> > PS - I seem to recall some problems with various bindings tests. If these
> > problems exist, we should probably get them into TODO-1.6 so that they are
> > tracked as blockers for branch.
> Unless they were fixed today, there are still some failing Serf tests.
> The Ruby tests do not currently pass.
> There is an error in JavaHL but the test was specifically added to
> show a bug that was recently discovered.
I added these items to TODO-1.6 in r34659.
Received on 2008-12-10 20:51:56 CET