[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: unhappy with 'svn mv'

From: David Glasser <glasser_at_davidglasser.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:51:03 -0800

Eh, my "bunch of work" was mostly limited to "make sure it doesn't corrupt
your wc state", not actually making it do anything useful. Did we actually
have a real use case where copy-on-update actually worked?

I guess once Greg is done making wc code less painful to write somebody
could do the second half of that feature (which makes it work when a delete
precedes the add, which is usually the case).


On Dec 9, 2008 8:48 AM, "Ben Collins-Sussman" <sussman_at_red-bean.com> wrote:

Not me, but the OpenOffice guys are:


Thought it was interesting to post here. I know that for 1.5, I
*tried* to solve this problem partially, and glasser did a bunch of
work on it too. Do we have any happy progress to report on this,
should we want to respond to his blog?


Received on 2008-12-09 18:57:07 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.