Re: unhappy with 'svn mv'

Eh, my "bunch of work" was mostly limited to "make sure it doesn't corrupt
your wc state", not actually making it do anything useful. Did we actually
have a real use case where copy-on-update actually worked?

I guess once Greg is done making wc code less painful to write somebody
could do the second half of that feature (which makes it work when a delete
precedes the add, which is usually the case).

--dave

On Dec 9, 2008 8:48 AM, "Ben Collins-Sussman" <sussman_at_red-bean.com> wrote:

Not me, but the OpenOffice guys are:

http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/mistaking_version_control_for_collaboration

Thought it was interesting to post here. I know that for 1.5, I
*tried* to solve this problem partially, and glasser did a bunch of
work on it too. Do we have any happy progress to report on this,
should we want to respond to his blog?

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=981745

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=981778
Received on 2008-12-09 18:57:07 CET