[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: What's left TODO for 1.6.x?

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 08:19:40 -0500

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
<hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> This mail was going to be about a new branch date for 1.6.x, but I noticed that
> there are still a few items labeled "Blocker" in TODO-1.6. They are reproduced
> below:
> * Other items
> - implement or back out svn_wc_queue_committed2()
> - back out svn_wc__adm_{save,get}_pristine_path, since gstein has
> found another way to access the necessary data. (leave the new
> shared state stuff in there, however)
> * Actually document how to build with SQLite (ie, make the part in
> INSTALL not blank, explain how to build against a newer version
> of SQLite than what may be installed in your system, figure out
> if the text in sqlite.m4 about being able to use a sqlite/
> subdirectory is in any way true, etc etc)
> Are there any volunteers to tackle these above issues? They don't look too
> difficult, but I'm personally not very familiar with any of them.
> If these issues can be reasonably accomplished in the next week, is there any
> reason not to branch 1.6.x on Dec. 12?

So is tree conflicts ready now or have they just not declared stuff in TO-DO?

What about the state of tests? Last I checked the bindings were not
all passing. What about Serf? If all the tests are passing and tree
conflicts is "ready", I'd say +1. I think we should not branch until
we are ready to go straight to RC1 though.

Mark Phippard
Received on 2008-12-08 10:41:14 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.