[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.5.5 this week?

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 08:20:39 +0200 (Jerusalem Standard Time)

Paul Burba wrote on Thu, 4 Dec 2008 at 14:16 -0500:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> > Thanks for digging these up. After merging the actions.py part of r33974,
> > the test at least runs, but fails on the directory case (which was added
> > in r34053) due to missing UUID in the 'info' output (the file case
> > passes). After I also merged r33775, r33782, r33786, and r33788, the
> > whole test passed.
>
> Ugh, really, I tried that and it still failed, that's when I went crazy :-P
>

Yeah, it wasn't smooth. There were 3-4 conflicts to resolve on the way
(see log of the branch).

> > I'll look more closely later tonight.
>
> A 1000 thank yous! Let us know what you find, I'll be happy to review
> any nominations you make to get this working.
>

I've backported all five changes to 1.5.x-r34050-followups branch now;
could you look it if fixes merge_tests 89 for you? (It does for me.)

In the backports, I haven't yet looked into the details of the conflict
that I fixed as part of r34570 (the 'depth' parameter differs). It's
probably trivial (and I'll look into it before +1ing the backport), but
for now that's the least-reviewed part of the backport branch.

HTH,

Daniel

> Paul
>

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=979946
Received on 2008-12-05 09:25:16 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.