[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: New mailing list software: [Fwd: svn commit: r34521 - in branches/1.5.x-reintegrate-improvements: . notes/tree-conflicts subversion/bindings/swig subversion/include/private subversion/libsvn_client subversion/libsvn_subr subversion/tests/cmdline

From: David Glasser <glasser_at_davidglasser.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:23:24 -0800

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:10 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> Daniel Rall wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com> wrote:
>>> The commit emails need to be modified to fix:
>>> 1) There is no reply-to set to dev@ and the author of the commit.
>> Today's configuration (10am PST) shows the reply-to set to dev@. Looks
>> like it's either/or WRT sender; dev@ seems like the better choice
>> since we have to pick one or the other.
> Are mail headers additive? Could we set the list to "Reply to sender" but
> then add custom headers with:
> Reply-to: dev_at_subversion.tigris.org, svn_at_subversion.tigris.org

Why do we want that? People shouldn't be sending mail to svn@, and
the "sender" is some username_at_tigris.org which I always assume goes
nowhere useful anyway. What's wrong with Reply-to: dev@?


David Glasser | glasser@davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
Received on 2008-12-02 20:25:38 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.