[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: RFC: Untangling the peg revision knot

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:11:40 -0500

Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU> writes:
> On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 01:49 +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> The proposals I'm making come from some years of observing otherwise
>> quite brilliant programmers breaking their heads against SVN and peg
>> revisions. They're not necessarily a personal preference. This is not
>> about my opinion vs. yours, it's about things I've observed vs. the
>> current status quo.
>
> Having read the whole conversation, I have the following observations:
>
> [...]

While I was reading this thread, I didn't have time to write a thorough,
constructive response. However, if I had, it would have said exactly
what Greg Hudson just said.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-28 15:11:55 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.