Re: RFC: Untangling the peg revision knot

Branko Čibej wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
>
>> It feels like you are just grasping at straws now, because regardless
>> as to whether users EVER understand this feature or whether we decide
>> to change the default for URL's it will always make sense for @BASE to
>> be the default for a WC.
>>
> So you're never confused by "svn log" not showing changes more recent
> than those in your WC? That being just an example of the problem and not
> at all grasping at straws.
>

For what it's worth - this exact issue confused me for about 2 seconds
yesterday. Not to say that having it be HEAD would confuse people less,
but it's definitely a point of ambiguity...

Cheers,
mark

-- 
Mark Mielke <mark_at_mielke.cc>