[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: RFC: Untangling the peg revision knot (was: A preliminary study of non-contiguous transformations in the Hilbert space of Alexandrian solutions)

From: Branko ─îibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:25:30 +0100

C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Well, I did consider that perhaps as an early Subversion user with some gaps
> in participation along the way (like gstein, who voiced similar complaints),
> you might be one of those who knew nothing but -r (because that's all there
> was for several years) and simply missed the innovation that was peg
> revisions. Old habits are hard to break, even when they no longer serve you
> beneficially.

It appears that all the people I've ever spoken to, except for some on
this list, are early Subversion users and are confused by the
*incompatible change in behaviour* that happened with the introduction
of peg revisions.

Note that I've known about peg revs from day one and how they work, and
*still* get bitten by a change that I find non-intuitive.

I wonder if it would make sense to do a survey on the users@ list about
this. I prophesy that most responses would be either "what's a peg
revision?" or "yes, I get bitten by that all the time."

-- Brane

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-26 21:25:50 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.