David Glasser wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
> <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>> I just finished doing a test load the ASF repo, and these are some relevant
>> numbers (sizes reported by `du -sh'):
>> 1.5: 26 GB
>> trunk: 23 GB (11.5% smaller than 1.5)
>> packed trunk: 22 GB (15.4% smaller than 1.5)
>> I may attempt to do the same process with bdb, but the bdb installation on the
>> box that I'm using is currently borked, so it may take a while.
> I take it the first difference is due to rep sharing? Seems like a
> noticeable change for a repository of that size, yeah.
Yes, the first difference can be attributed to rep-sharing. The 23 GB number
also includes the >300MB rep-cache sqlite database.
Received on 2008-11-21 21:33:03 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev