Re: To reintegrate or not to be ...

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:56:51 +0000

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:28:12PM +0100, Branko ??ibej wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > In fact, for --reintegrate to work, the to-be-reintegrated branch must have had
> > all the changes thus far from the target branch merged into it.
>
> Wait -- *all*? Wouldn't that be the sort of moving target that's a
> nightmare to keep catching up with?

See this thread:
http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=145500

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-18 19:57:08 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Julian Foad: "Re: T/C and 1.6 (was Re: Lose users?)"
Previous message: Greg Hudson: "Re: Why ra_serf should not (yet) be the default WebDAV RA implementation"
In reply to: Branko Čibej: "Re: To reintegrate or not to be ..."
Next in thread: Branko Čibej: "Re: To reintegrate or not to be ..."
Reply: Branko Čibej: "Re: To reintegrate or not to be ..."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]