Re: T/C and 1.6 (was Re: Lose users?)
From: Stephen Butler <sbutler_at_elego.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:20:52 +0100
Quoting "Hyrum K. Wright" <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu>:
> After talking with Karl in IRC just now, my view is kind of changing:
> I think the trepidation to yank the tree conflicts APIs for 1.6
Guilty as charged, your honor. ;-) I also tend to focus too closely
The code for tree conflict detection, skipping, and status-reporting
Leaving users to detect tree conflicts on their own isn't an ideal
Tree conflict fans, do you agree?
> As a thought experiment, how difficult would it be to release 1.6
TODO: Take out TC code and tests, restore old error messages
A few hours, I guess. I think we could safely plan to branch
Steve
-- Stephen Butler | Software Developer elego Software Solutions GmbH Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25 | 13355 Berlin | Germany fon: +49 30 2345 8696 | mobile: +49 163 25 45 015 fax: +49 30 2345 8695 | http://www.elegosoft.com Geschäftsführer: Olaf Wagner | Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 77719 | USt-IdNr: DE163214194 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.orgReceived on 2008-11-18 02:21:08 CET |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.