[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Why ra_serf should not (yet) be the default WebDAV RA implementation

From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 21:16:48 +0100

[I'm answering to a random e-mail in this thread.]

I also noticed another Neon's feature - it contains some translations:
http://svn.webdav.org/repos/projects/neon/trunk/po/

I can help in creating Polish Serf translation, if you want.

-- 
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis

application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part.

Received on 2008-11-16 21:21:57 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis: "Re: svn commit: r33872 - trunk/tools/dev"
Previous message: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis: "Re: svn commit: r34221 - in trunk/subversion: include include/private libsvn_subr svn svnsync"
In reply to: C. Michael Pilato: "Why ra_serf should not (yet) be the default WebDAV RA implementation"
Next in thread: Greg Stein: "Re: Four failing tests on trunk with ra_serf."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.