[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Lose users? -- was: Re: Update on my previous tree conflict scenario

From: Neels J. Hofmeyr <neels_at_elego.de>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100

Greg Stein wrote:
> Personally, I would give the tree conflict folks until first/second
> week of January (i.e. just post-break) to wrap their work. And by
> "wrap", I mean finish or cut. I think it is TOTALLY acceptable for us
> to ship 1.6 in a Jan/Feb timeframe, so I'm more than willing to give
> them the *proper* time to get the work done and make it solid. I fear
> that putting this feature "under the gun" will be a bad outcome for
> everybody. It also seems to be reasonable/close enough that we can
> take a month or two to get it wrapped (or cut, worst case).

When you say EOY, then that's a whole new story. I was expecting the
branching to take place tomorrow-ish, us handing in patches onto the branch
and having to release before christmas. If we can carry on developing "on
trunk" until christmas, I think that we'll have sufficient tree-conflicts
usability for a release. Tree-conflicts folks, do you agree?


Received on 2008-11-16 05:00:36 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.