Re: Tree conflicts WC API - making it private; adm_access

Eric Gillespie wrote:
> Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Access batons should disappear.
>>
>> There will be a "context" for working with the WC, but it will be the
>> same context regardless of what directory (or even working copy!) that
>> you're talking about. You'll be able to record tree conflict on a
>> directory sitting under an unversioned directory.

Wow, that will make a *lot* of stuff much simpler and clearer. I've also
seen functions that use the access baton to indicate what directory to act
on... Will be very nice to see all that stuff go away.

>
> Woohoo, this is fantastic! Or would be, if I still worked with svn.
>
> Big -1 to making the wc library private.

LOL :)