[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Branching 1.6.x this week

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:57:44 -0800

My own efforts are simply "coding as I go", so I'm just working until
the branch occurs. My changes are very incremental, and generally
non-stabilizing (okay, fine... so I broke it yesterday :-P). I'm not
expecting to get the new pristine stuff in there unless the branch is
going to be a few weeks out.

Right now, "all" of the activity is around the tree conflict work.
Like myself, I suspect others are just "filling in".

So. Ask those guys :-)


On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
<hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> [second verse, same as the first...]
>> Alright folks, we're branching 1.6.x this week. Here's the schedule of events:
> [snip]
> So, people will probably notice the conspicuous lack of a branch yesterday. It
> seems there's more issues outstanding than just failing tests and incomplete docs.
> Let's take a step back. Given the outstanding items (TODO-1.6), what is a
> realistic branch date? I think it's frustrating and counterproductive to keep
> setting and ignoring branch dates, so let's set one that will hold *and live by
> it*! I don't know what is realistic for people, 2 weeks out? A month? Next
> week? Please chime in.
> -Hyrum
> PS - If you've got things which need to get done before 1.6 branches, please add
> them to TODO-1.6. Even if you're planning on doing them, it will help the rest
> of us understand where we sit as we prepare to branch. Thanks.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-13 20:57:57 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.