On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 21:22 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Markus Springweiler wrote on Tue, 11 Nov 2008 at 14:48 +0100:
> > What's wrong with this? I consider this a serious bug -- should I just hack
> > it into the bugtracker although the website says I should discuss this first
> > *here*?
>
> +1. (FWIW, I can reproduce it with my possibly-somewhat-old trunk build.)
> I hoped to find some time to look into it, but haven't yet :(
Markus,
Thank you for sending the bug report: that was the right thing to do.
And the reproduction script is extremely helpful. The only thing wrong
is that there aren't enough people here with enough time or interest
right now to investigate this bug report. I hope someone here will be
able to find the bug and fix it, but I cannot guarantee it. If you would
like to get involved in debugging it yourself (or if you know someone
who could), we would be very willing to help you.
I think Daniel's "+1" means "yes, please go ahead and file a bug report
in the issue tracker." Please include the URL of this mail thread in a
mail archive, such as
"<http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2008-11/0232.shtml>".
Thanks.
- Julian
> (BTW, I'm attaching a slightly more reusable (wrapped and with config
> variable) version of your repro script.)
>
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I tried the following with 1.5.3 and 1.5.4, starting with SharpSv,
> > > verified with TortoiseSvn and finally wrote the script below (against
> > > SlikSvn:tag/1.5.4_at_33870 Win32) which is meant to be executed in
> > > "D:\Temp\dummy" -- or the 6 occurences of "file:///d:/temp/dummy" have to
> > > be changed accordingly:
> > >
> > > rem create base-repo
> > > mkdir repo1
[...]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-11 22:53:00 CET