Re: HTTP protocol v2: single commit request, or many PUTs?

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> IMO, it is easier to understand if you keep the operations separate
> rather than glom them all into one bigass request. Those big glommed
> requests then need to be parsed to be broken up. They also don't
> restart very well in the face of network failure, packet drops, or
> connection closures.

+1. I believe it is far simpler to understand splitting the requests
up rather than creating more 'fake' pseudo-requests.

Tracking errors with a glommed request is a nightmare - plus, knowing
how we would almost certainly implement glommed requests, the content
likely would be base64 XML-encoded. Ugh. -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-10 23:42:20 CET