Re: Tree-conflicts: pressing tasks?

On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 02:43 +0100, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> do you have any urgent tasks that you would want me to help with before
> Wednesday?

It would be great if you could advance the per-victim semantics, by
making "svn resolved" work per victim.

I recommend first converting "svn revert" or "svn info" (or both) to use
svn_wc__walk_entries_and_tc(), and check that they still work, to prove
that that new walker function works. "svn revert" and "svn info"
currently both do their own recursion in order to get correct per-victim
behaviour.

Then convert "svn resolved" to use it. The attached patch mostly does
this, but there's still a problem with it trying to get the adm_access
for an unversioned dir, the same kind of error you pointed out for me a
few days ago. update_tests 15 shows that error ("warning: Directory
'[...]/A/D/G' is missing"). Another error shows up in
tree_conflict_tests.py 1: it fails to resolve a tree conflict.

Thanks.
- Julian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org