Re: SWIG and platform-specific auth providers (Was: Python bindings build seems broken)

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Jeremy Whitlock <jcscoobyrs_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes we would expose the new API from the Ruby bindings.
>>
>> My compatibility concerns arise from your statement that the "the explicit use
>> of the platform-specific auth providers in Ruby should be removed." Since we
>> put them out there it seems like we have to support them, but I realized as I
>> was reviewing your refactoring in the other thread that we could make the Ruby
>> bindings support the old APIs through this new interface.
>
> You maintain the bindings right? If I commit the patch, do you mind
> exposing the new function, and upgrading the old functions to really
> just call the new function behind the scenes? Actually, you take
> whatever approach you want. ;)
>

I'm in :-). I'll do the best I can. This isn't my biggest Ruby
binding problem right now. :-)

--
Joe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org