We certainly can add cache headers in some cases.
(tho no cache headers if there are no params, since the HEAD can float)
Cheers,
-g
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Mark Mielke <mark_at_mark.mielke.cc> wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Ben Collins-Sussman
> <sussman_at_red-bean.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Meanwhile, in the same spirit of abandoning DeltaV, we want to do
> something we've been discussing doing for (literally) years:
> annnouncing a completely open syntax for fetching (rev,path) objects
> over HTTP. In the past, people have sort of figured out that
> "!svn/bc/REV/path" is the sooper-sekrit syntax, but we've warned
> people not to depend on it. No more of that. We'd like to officially
> support what source-browsers and other tools have already been doing
> for years:
>
> path?r=REV
>
>
> In IRC yesterday, gstein said you were going to use this format:
>
> path;REV
>
> I believe he said it was because the ? causes caching proxies to not cache?
>
>
>
> If caching is an issue - why not make sure to output the right caching
> headers?
>
> Cheers,
> mark
>
> --
> Mark Mielke <mark_at_mielke.cc>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-06 06:00:22 CET