Re: [PATCH] Tree conflicts - revert and resolve per victim
From: Stephen Butler <sbutler_at_elego.de>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:18:04 +0100
Quoting Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>:
>
That's interesting. I hadn't thought that status could be done
>> I'm working on svn resolve (your last item) currently. I
I'm trying to implement all of the resolve --accept options that
/** If the item at @a victim_path is tree-conflicted, remove the tree
It's a counterpart of the {get, add} functions we already have.
Since I hadn't figured out a solution for the recursive case, as
Steve
-- Stephen Butler | Software Developer elego Software Solutions GmbH Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25 | 13355 Berlin | Germany fon: +49 30 2345 8696 | mobile: +49 163 25 45 015 fax: +49 30 2345 8695 | http://www.elegosoft.com Geschäftsführer: Olaf Wagner | Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 77719 | USt-IdNr: DE163214194 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.orgReceived on 2008-11-05 21:18:21 CET |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.