[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: HTTP protocol v2: rethunk.

From: <kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:41:00 -0600

sussman_at_gmail.com wrote on 11/05/2008 11:08:15 AM:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:01 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
> > I'll bet you a can of Starkist Solid White Albacore Tuna that you'll
> Wha? That's like betting a beer connoisseur a bottle of Miller Lite.
> > pressed into supporting the full peg-revision syntax if you open this
can of
> > worms. An easy way to lose the bet is to do nothing and wait for me
> > press you for it. ;-) An easy way to win the bet is to preclude the
> > pressing by adding the feature out of the box.
> >
> > path?[p=PEG&]r=REV (where P defaults to HEAD)
> >
> I'm fine with that. If you look at the revision I just committed
> (r34070), I have a simple TODO there:
> /* ### TODO: someday we should parse *all* query args into an
> apr_table_t, the way mod_form does. */
> Shockingly, you'd think that either apache or apr would provide an API
> to parse a long query string into a table, but I'm not seeing
> anything. Any volunteers?

I'm guessing you can borrow something from:

Specifically, dig around in here:

At this point, I can't even volunteer the time to write
this email, let alone integrating the code...

Kevin R.
Received on 2008-11-05 18:41:20 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.