Re: HTTP protocol v2: rethunk.

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:01 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>
>> I'll bet you a can of Starkist Solid White Albacore Tuna that you'll get
>
> Wha? That's like betting a beer connoisseur a bottle of Miller Lite. :-)

Yah. That was sorta the intent. ;-)

> Beyond the parsing part, I guess the code would have to do more than
> simply pretend the person had typed "!svn/bc/REV/path" -- it would
> actually have to make an fs call to follow history to the peg. Not a
> huge deal.

Nah. It can simply use the svn_repos_trace_node_locations() API.

The only big deal is that we won't want to release the peg-less version of
your protocol change in 1.6 because it presents a compatibility problem with
the now-planned peg-ful version. So, are you committing to the work, or
will you be reverting your recent trunk change?

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand