Re: [PATCH]: WC commit code shouldn't zero the tree_conflicts_data field?

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 18:34:50 +0100

On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 04:12:34PM +0000, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 14:24 +0000, Julian Foad wrote:
> > Does this make sense, anyone?
>
> I hope so. It's r34044.
>

Yes, I think it makes sense. The data should be cleared
per-victim via 'svn resolve[d]', not during commit.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-04 18:35:06 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Julian Foad: "[RFC] Don't allow a non-existent path to be a tree conflict victim?"
Previous message: Kamesh Jayachandran: "RE: svn commit: r34039 - branches/issue-2897-take2"
In reply to: Julian Foad: "Re: [PATCH]: WC commit code shouldn't zero the tree_conflicts_data field?"
Next in thread: Neels J. Hofmeyr: "Re: [PATCH]: WC commit code shouldn't zero the tree_conflicts_data field?"
Reply: Neels J. Hofmeyr: "Re: [PATCH]: WC commit code shouldn't zero the tree_conflicts_data field?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]