[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: WC rewrite questions

From: Listman <listman_at_burble.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 19:50:03 +0000

if you use the --targets option and pass in the list of objects via a
file is this an issue?

On Oct 31, 2008, at 3:52 PM- Oct 31, 2008, Miller, Eric wrote:

> A few quick questions on the upcoming WC rewrite.
> First - is there a spec for the proposed wc rewrite? Perhaps my
> questions are already answered there.
> Second - I have a problem with the way the wc adm_crawler is
> currently implemented in that it finishes the reporter.
> In the case of the wc update routines, this effectively causes a new
> connection to the repository to be created for every path given to
> the client.
> For a large number of input paths this overhead becomes the dominant
> factor in update times which may be orders of magnitude longer than
> if done over a single connection.
> Will the wc rewrite address this issue and allow the update of
> multiple wc paths using a single RA connection?
> Third - I am concerned about maintaining multi-user access with the
> new WC model. Is the current POR to lock the entire WC for write
> operations? If so, this could have some very negative consequences
> in our environment.
> Thanks,
> Eric
Received on 2008-11-03 21:40:30 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.