I think the quickest way to resolve this is for one of the 5-6 people who
already responded on the issue to volunteer to dig into this himself.
Don't sit and wait for us to fix it -- ask Jan Nijtmans; his one-line
mod_dav_svn patch is sitting around uncommitted for a few months now. :-(
Daniel
(who, OT, wonders if this feature couldn't be implemented client-side...)
Colin Alston wrote on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 at 10:40 +0200:
> Hello
>
> Would it be possible to see some movement/comment on #3275
> (http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3275)? The bug is a
> rather serious regression since SVN 1.5.1 which just keeps persisting.
> For those that implemented svnsync schemes at release we are pretty much
> jammed on 1.5.0 and yelling at users that try to upgrade their clients.
>
> There is a general consensus on the bug that the priority should be
> raised to P1. Please can at least that happen so there aren't another 4
> revisions that ignore the fact that SVN sync proxy is essentially
> completely broken?
>
> Regards,
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-10-30 23:29:41 CET