On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 12:03 -0500, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> There's been a bit of discussion in response to my mail of last week about
> branching 1.6 on Wednesday (see
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2008-10/0818.shtml). However, I haven't heard
> any screaming complaints or needs to push the date back, so I'm still planning
> on branching 1.6 on Nov. 5, 1700 UTC.
>
> As I mentioned earlier, if people feel they need another week or so be get stuff
> in for 1.6, I don't think that's too much of a problem, but please make it known
> soon!
I've just added "svn resolved must act on a victim path, not a parent
path" to the TODO-1.6 file. The problem Mark noticed (which reminded us
of that) is another one and I would expect more.
We're still working on tree conflicts and I'm not confident that it's
just one or two things left to do - we don't have a clear list of what's
still needed.
How can we best put some tight bounds on what's needed? Here's one idea:
write out one use case from start to finish, and work it through with
the present code, looking for problems where documenting a work-around
is the most expedient way, and for where code fixes are essential. I'll
start that.
- Julian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-10-30 19:56:43 CET