On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:59 AM, David Glasser
> <glasser_at_davidglasser.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
>> <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>>> There's been a bit of discussion in response to my mail of last week about
>>> branching 1.6 on Wednesday (see
>>> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2008-10/0818.shtml). However, I haven't heard
>>> any screaming complaints or needs to push the date back, so I'm still planning
>>> on branching 1.6 on Nov. 5, 1700 UTC.
>>>
>>> As I mentioned earlier, if people feel they need another week or so be get stuff
>>> in for 1.6, I don't think that's too much of a problem, but please make it known
>>> soon!
>>
>> I assume you're aware of my opinions on the current state of FSFS and
>> its releasibility. (This doesn't necessary mean it can't get fixed on
>> the branch, of course, but that's more effort.)
>
> IMO, we should never "plan" on fixing things on the branch. If there
> is a plan to do so, then we shouldn't branch in the first place.
I would generally agree, but I am failing to put any real time into
the project these days, and am only really monitoring commits to
libsvn_fs_fs. I would absolutely object to a release of 1.6 from
trunk in its current state based on the FSFS situation, but if more
active developers think it is not worth delaying the branch over, I
would defer.
--dave
--
David Glasser | glasser@davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-10-30 19:13:30 CET