Re: svn edit

Harvey, Edward wrote:
>> Just to illustrate what I mean by "optimizing WC scans" and put some
>> code where my mouth is ... here's a *very* trivial example. See the
>> attached script. On my box, the less_stupid scan is consistenly 30-40%
>> faster (with full caches!) than the stupid one, merely because it tries
>> to keep accesses slightly more local.
>>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "with full caches"

s/full/hot if you prefer

> or "keep access more local"

*That* is the crucial bit. :) Go read the two implementations again, it
should be obvious.

-- Brane

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-10-28 18:35:55 CET