Re: fs-rep-sharing branch

Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> As for bdb, I'm not sure what the best way to enable/disable it would be, or
> even what the performance gain would be. Mike, do you have any ideas?

BDB doesn't currently have a Subversion-level, admin-accessible
configuration file. So we'd need to invent something here.

If we had such a beast, I think the code would be resilient. Put it this
way -- it *better* be. I think the case just breaks down to behaving as if
we never find existing reps to reuse, so we don't reuse them. I think the
'checksum-reps' table is currently expendable; the new 'miscellaneous' table
is *not* though.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand