Re: fs-rep-sharing branch

On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, if all you care about is speed, then revert the fsfs rep-sharing
>>> code entirely... it makes FSFS strictly less correct and presumably
>>> strictly slower, bringing only a space benefit which (for FSFS)
>>> appears to not be that large.
>>>
>> I agree with David: Subversion reliability is much more important than
>> speed. Also I do not understand why we so care about disk space for
>> repository: disk space is very cheap and become cheaper every day.
>> Think that priority list should be:
>> - Reliability
>> - Speed (CPU/memory usage)
>> - Disk space
>
> I agree, but only to the extent that this is not outrageous: I've got
> a repository of 27MB (CVS) which explodes to around 500MB (disk use)
> in Subversion.

Does the rep-sharing help here, though?

--dave

-- 
David Glasser | glasser@davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org