[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Regression in merge - yank release 1.5.3? [was: svn commit: r33696 - branches/1.5.x]

From: Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 07:20:45 -0500

Paul Burba wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
> <arfrever.fta_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2008-10-18 16:13:34 Mark Phippard napisaƂ(a):
>>> I did not get the impression the bug was THAT bad. It sounds like you
>>> are going by the wording of the backport proposal which makes it sound
>>> like merge is completely broken. I am not against a 1.5.4 but I'd
>>> like to hear from Paul. Perhaps we ought to just move up the 1.5.4
>>> schedule so that it happens in early November?
>> +1 for tagging 1.5.4 circa 2008-11-10.
>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com> wrote:
>>>> (Changing the subject line.)
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 05:54 -0500, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>>>> Greg Stein wrote:
>>>>>> Should we yank 1.5.3 and publish a 1.5.4 right away?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If this is a regression, then it seems we ought to pop out a 1.5.4 right away.
>>>>> Fine by me, if others feel that we need to. (Don't stay silent on this, people,
>>>>> I'd like a few +1's before going through the effort here.)
>>>>>
>>>>> -Hyrum
>
> Thinking about this a bit more, I'd like to see 1.5.4 as soon as possible. Why?

Sounds good. We'll roll on Wednesday.

All, please review and vote on STATUS items before then.

-Hyrum

Received on 2008-10-20 14:21:09 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.