Re: [PATCH] WC-ng definitions of BASE/WORKING/ACTUAL

Looks good to me.

The comment around BASE on a replaced node has got me thinking tho...
The copy really should only exist in WORKING, and BASE shouldn't be
changed. So really, it is more of a "BASE is unchanged, but if you'd
like access to the pristine data for the copy sitting in WORKING, then
<here> it is."

In any case, this is a good improvement, so please feel free to commit!

Cheers,
-g

2008/10/15 Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>:
> Does this edit reflect better what you meant BASE/WORKING/ACTUAL to
> refer to, as discussed just now, Greg and Erik? (Plus a new statement
> about EOL/keyword expansion.)
>
> - Julian
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-10-15 18:00:32 CEST