Seems fine, but where's the catch? Why would we NOT do this?
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Jeremy Whitlock <jcscoobyrs_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> What do you think about me switching the packaging around for
> Subversion on OSX? (http://www.collab.net/downloads/community/) What
> I'd like to do is deliver Subversion as an Umbrella Framework
> (http://tinyurl.com/OSX-Framework-Anatomy) where each Subversion dep
> is its own nested Framework. Below is a small list of benefits:
>
> * Multiple versions of Subversion coexisting on the same box
> * The ability to build Subversion-based apps
> * Potentially smaller installation packages after the initial
> installer with dependencies is installed
> * Less obtrusive to Subversion's developers
>
> Now, the packaging of the binary and the functionality of the binary
> would not change. This would be seamless to the end user other than
> the ability to have multiple versions of Subversion installed at the
> same time. What do you guys think?
>
> --
> Take care,
>
> Jeremy Whitlock
> http://www.thoughtspark.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-10-07 07:58:08 CEST