On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> The buildability of SQLite on Windows is NOT a concern.
>>
>> We are going to be using SQLite. Period. Therefore, it will need to be
>> a dependency, and it will need to be figured out.
>>
>> "Don't do it in 1.6" implies "Do it in 1.7" which is just *deferring*
>> the problem. It is not SOLVING the problem.
>>
>> Now. If you want to dispute the use of SQLite, then please do so. By all means.
>>
>> Until that discussion, we are going to use it, and that means adding
>> it as a dependency of Subversion.
>
> Chill out. No one is suggesting any such thing. I did raise one
> issue earlier and that was the version you are requiring and whether
> that could be a concern. And my only point there was, why not
> consider the "include single file" approach and build it into our
> library.
Subversion doesn't distribute Windows builds. There's no reason that
people who choose to distribute Windows builds couldn't use the
single-file sqlite3 as their implementation of "build with sqlite3".
--dave
> What you chose to comment on was just a side discussion on the Windows
> build process. We build SVN 1.5 for months with SQLite included,
> doing so again is not a problem in and of itself.
>
> --
> Thanks
>
> Mark Phippard
> http://markphip.blogspot.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
>
>
--
David Glasser | glasser@davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-10-02 19:45:05 CEST