Branko Čibej wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Eric Gillespie <epg_at_pretzelnet.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> close to being competitive with DVCS. You need more in your
>>> list, starting with merge tracking.
>>>
>>>
>> As I remember it, DannyB's argument was that if we switch to a revlog
>> format, merge tracking comes essentially for free. That was the
>> takeaway I took, but that was like a while ago now... =) -- justin
>>
>>
>
> Eh, not quite. Revlog as it stands today stores two ancestors per node,
> which is fine except for the cherry-picking case, where it breaks
> completely.
>
Oh, also the revlog-of-today (the implementation) has one *big* problem:
it expects to be able and willing to read whole files in memory. Perish
the thought.
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-10-02 13:01:31 CEST