Re: current plan for WC

On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> As far as I can tell the only "risk" is that we pick up one more
> dependency. And that is on something which is pretty much everywhere
> and is packaged by everybody.

This is a pretty key point. sqlite3 is *very* portable. Hell, we can
even *ship a copy of it as a single source file* with Subversion if we
want, though I think most packagers would rather have us link with
their versions.

Any system that can't run sqlite3 is sufficiently broken that I feel
no guilt about declaring that Subversion 1.5 should be good enough for
them.

--dave

-- 
David Glasser | glasser@davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org