[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r33366 - trunk/notes

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_red-bean.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 09:13:59 -0500

2008/10/1 Bert Huijben <B.Huijben_at_competence.biz>:

> I think providing both mod_dav_svn and mod_svn over the same public url encourages users to upgrade their servers to support mod_svn, while requiring all users to upgrade their clients before the migration will hold the server upgrade until the adminstrators are sure all users have updated.
> Which might take a couple of years for big hosters like sourceforge.

I agree this would be ideal, but it's not technically possible. As I
said before, two modules cannot both "own" the same public url. If
you have a brilliant idea on how to implement this, I'm all ears.

> Disabling old clients should be a user decision, not ours.

You're preaching to the choir... no need to write many paragraphs
explaining why this is a desirable goal. :-) I just can't see how to
make it happen.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-10-01 16:14:36 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.