[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r33306 - in branches/fs-rep-sharing/subversion/libsvn_fs_base: . bdb

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:24:31 -0700

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
<hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 9:35 PM, <hwright_at_tigris.org> wrote:
>>> + /* If our caller provided a checksum of the right kind to compare, do so. */
>>> + if (checksum
>>> + && checksum->kind == rep_checksum->kind
>>> + && !svn_checksum_match(checksum, rep_checksum))
>> Why check the kind? Doesn't svn_checksum_match() do that? And if not,
>> then it *should*.
> If the kinds differ, svn_checksum_match() will return FALSE. In this case, we
> don't want that, we don't even want to check different kinds of checksums. The
> root of the problem here is that since we're storing sha1 checksums, but dump
> files and ra frontends are giving us md5 checksums, we don't want to fail just
> because a checksum mismatch.

Ah. Gotcha.

Sounds a bit dangerous though, as those checksums are looking for
(say) on-wire corruption, or on-disk corruption.

>> And do we really need *both* forms? Why?
> See above. This is an attempt (albeit fruitless at this point), to compute
> *both* checksums, so that we can compare the same type in situations such as the
> above.

Fruitless? Hmm?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-09-30 18:24:43 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.