RE: svn revision r0 question

On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 09:36 -0700, Paul Charlton wrote:
> I guess we should question the assumption that both revision and the
> svn:date property associated with the revision should be monotonically
> increasing. To me, they are separate concepts, can use separate persistent
> storage, and can use separate indices for sort/search and retrieval.

You're still focused on the implementation. The implementation is not
the problem.

{2007-01-02} has *no meaning* if revisions are not linearly
date-ordered.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-09-29 19:03:12 CEST