On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 09:34 -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
> julianfoad_at_tigris.org wrote:
> > Author: julianfoad
> > Date: Wed Sep 24 23:32:16 2008
> > New Revision: 33288
> >
> > Log:
> > In "svn status", report tree conflict status on each victim individually.
> > (For the time being, we still also report the parent as having tree-conflicted
> > children.) In the test suite, adjust a test that looks at this status output
> > directly. Provide support for this new status character to be tested using an
> > attribute of StateItem, which will be the normal way to test it, but make the
> > testing of this attribute optional and do not make any tests request it yet.
> >
> > * subversion/svn/status.c
> > (print_status): Print "T" in the tree status column if this is a tree
> > conflict victim.
>
> How about printing a "C" in that column instead. I think people are pretty used
> to seeing a "C" to mean conflict. And "T" can appear in the sixth lock column
> which will make it harder to distinguish if I have a tree conflict or a stolen
> lock without counting columns.
How about it? Sure, it's a fair option. It might well be better.
Suggestion noted, and I think I agree. I'll be happy to change it when
there's a consensus. Until then it's a bike-shed that requires changes
in a few places in the test suite and a test-build each time we change
it, so I'll avoid hasty action.
Thanks.
- Julian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-09-25 19:10:21 CEST