On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 18:33 +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 03:34:12PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> > I don't want to bike-shed about this. I think the best thing to do here
> > is to go for a separate column, so that we're not hiding any
> > information. It will be easier to judge whether the extra information is
> > really useful if we can see it than if we hid it to start with.
>
> +1
>
> Let's try an extra column first.
> We can still change it if it turns out that we don't like it.
Of course that means we have to modify a whole bunch of existing tests
just to cope with having an extra column, before we start using it.
I'm doing that right now, in a separate commit. It will add a blank
column after the first six columns.
The log message is:
[[[
Add a blank column to the "svn status" output after the first six
columns, to make way for a tree-conflict status indication.
* subversion/svn/status.c
(print_status): Print an extra blank.
* subversion/tests/cmdline/depth_tests.py,
subversion/tests/cmdline/revert_tests.py,
subversion/tests/cmdline/special_tests.py,
subversion/tests/cmdline/stat_tests.py,
subversion/tests/cmdline/svnadmin_tests.py
Wherever a particular status output is expected: Expect an extra
blank.
* subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/tree.py
(build_tree_from_status): Expect an extra blank.
]]]
- Julian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-09-23 00:15:04 CEST