[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: WC-NG: the trees BASE, WORKING and ACTUAL [was: svn commit: r33021 - branches/explore-wc/subversion/libsvn_wc]

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:43:02 -0400

Erik Huelsmann wrote:
>>> I submit that it is much more sensible to define WORKING as I suggested
>>> in my earlier mail. (i.e. having the disk file contents)
>> I agree. I had considered this in the course of composing my mail, but lost
>> it by the time I finished editing. I should have said
>> BASE + Subversion-managed changes + file content modifications = WORKING.
>> WORKING + non-textual-and-non-Subversiony-changes = ACTUAL.
> Well, I would have liked to put it that way, but how does that work in
> this scenario:
> $ rm file.txt
> $ mkdir file.txt
> ?

EVIL! I suppose you wanna pitch a fork() and a 'chmod 666' into that
recipe, too, right?! SICKO!

C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on 2008-09-11 20:43:17 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.