[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r33021 - branches/explore-wc/subversion/libsvn_wc

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:51:07 -0400

Those are the correct definitions, per wc-by-design.

On Sep 11, 2008, at 12:18, "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato_at_collab.net>

> Julian Foad wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 08:27 -0700, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> Thanks for the thoughts.
>>> Note that we need to be able to iterate over all three trees. This
>>> code just iterates over WORKING, so it won't even have to stat().
>>> I'll
>>> need to expand this now to be able to iterate over BASE (no stats)
>>> and
>>> over ACTUAL (use readdir), so I can see what those look like.
>>> Now that I think about it, the read_info() needs to be able to
>>> signal
>>> an unversioned item when iterating over ACTUAL.
>> When we say "WORKING" and "ACTUAL", I'm wondering what exactly we
>> mean
>> by each of them.
> My guess: BASE is what BASE is today. WORKING is how the working
> copy
> ought to look given BASE plus the state changes recorded by the
> working copy
> library. ACTUAL is how the working copy really looks.
> $ svn rm file.txt
> $ touch file.txt
> BASE has file.txt. WORKING has not. ACTUAL has.
> If I'm wrong, and if my guess is the same as Julian's, we might need
> some
> clearer terms.
> --
> C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On
> Demand

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-09-11 18:51:47 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.